Paper notebook used for panaji narkasur donation fraud of R&AW/CBI employees

When google, tata, ntro, cbi employees started their identity theft fraud on a google competitor in 2010, they were overconfident that it would succeed, because the google competitor was storing almost all data in digital format on her computer, which ntro could easily hack , steal, misuse and modify. Realizing that there was nothing she could do as a citizen to end the data theft and misuse of name as ntro employees are extremely powerful, the google competitor stopped keeping any important information on her computers

Without access to financial information, the identity theft attempt largely failed as the income tax returns reflected the real finances of the 10 google, tata sponsored R&AW/CBI employees who were impersonating the google competitor to get a monthly indian government salary. Though crores of tax payer money had been wasted, the cbi and ntro employees are realizing that the google competitor is likely to store data offline in future, in a paper notebook, as the ntro employees are extremely powerful and are hacking her laptop.

However the powerful fraud NTRo/CBI employees continue to extort money from the google competitor at every opportunity, the latest being the narkarsur donation fraud in campal, panaji .On 5 october 2017, the google competitor was cheated in a narkasur donation fraud in campal goa by a young man named nikhil, who was allegedly working for google, tata sponsored fraud R&AW/CBI employees sunaina, naina and her associates .

The young man and his friend came to the house asking for narkasur donations. There was a list of people who had donated earlier written on the last pages of a long notebook and though the google competitor gave Rs 100, she later realized that the handwriting for all the donations were exactly the same, The fraud nikhil and his associates had written the names of the people in the area and put any imaginary amount against their name, trying to extort money from the google competitor.
For some they had indicated Rs 500 , others Rs 200, and they were expecting a matching amount from the google competitor, who gave a smaller amount as she has less money
The pen used was also not working , in another indication of the fraud. Only the google competitor was targetted for the donation, not the neighbours as Nikhil, a thin dark complexioned young man, wearing a dark blue shirt, and his associate who came asking for donation zoomed off on a scooter, they did not go door to door which is the usual practice for donations or other activities which are targetted to all the people in the locality

The google competitor does not receive even blue dart slips, however these people were able to knock on the door repeatedly clearly indicating that surveillance was used for finding out when she was at home for extorting money. They had written the false list of donors for the panaji narkasur donation fraud, on the last pages of the long notebook as the CBI/NTRO/R&AW identity theft failed because the paper notebook was used for keeping financial records. From the income tax returns they must have found that the calculations on paper were also accurate, so they could not find any fault, so they are looking for alternate methods to extort money.

Leave a Reply